Kenyatta University land saga on WHO logistics hub calls on leaders to be guided by the PESTEL concept when making decisions

In the 1970’s a well-executed strategy saw Kenya get the approval to host the headquarters of the United Nations Environment programme (UNEP) in Gigiri, which has led to tremendous transformation of our capital city. This decision made Nairobi to be the only city in the developing world to host the headquarters of any United Nations agencies as all others are in developed world. This has continued to give Kenya lots of bragging rights, which leads to immense opportunities in itself. We almost got another opportunity in 2018 to host the headquarters of the African Export Import Bank (Afri-Exim Bank) but because some people focused on extreme procedures, Uganda snapped the opportunity. The bid to host the World Health Organization African logistics hub should be seen in these lights. Though the matter has been taken to court, the debate has focused so much on procedures without looking at the greater opportunity to create jobs and employment to the surrounding people, the research opportunity that will come from the logistics hub, the linkages that the university can create from that and also the revenues that it can generate to shore up its dwindling finances, the increased demand and prices for the properties along the area that leads to forward and backward linkages in property and real estate development, in addition to increased travel and conference tourism that we need to develop as a country.

The opportunity presented to KU could have been quickly grabbed by some other university if it was offered to them. There is need for the managers of universities to be ambitious and focused on long term infrastructure and assets development through collaborations and partnerships with local and international partners to reduce their dependency on the exchequer. Leaders of all walks of life should be guided by one of the core principles of management, that dwells on balancing of the concept of PESTEL in all decisions. PESTEL stands for Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental and Legal aspects of any decision or development. At the back of the mind of such a leader, they should answer the question of whether the decision they are making is balanced to the Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental and Legal realities of the times we are living in.

Published by Dr. Daniel Mutegi Giti, PhD.

I hold a Ph.D. in Urban Management; Master of Urban Management and Post Graduate Diploma in Housing from the University of Nairobi. My Undergraduate was a Geography major and Sociology minor from Egerton University. I am an Assistant Director for Housing - Slum Upgrading, State Department for Housing and Urban Development, within the Ministry of Transport, Infrastructure, Housing, Urban Development and Public works in Kenya. I have hands on experience on matters housing and urban development process in Kenya, including developing skills necessary to tackle the underfunding of housing and urban sectors through innovative financing and greater private sector participation through models like application of Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) in the infrastructure and housing development in Kenya and Africa.

5 thoughts on “Kenyatta University land saga on WHO logistics hub calls on leaders to be guided by the PESTEL concept when making decisions

  1. Good analysis given daktari.

    Despite the plans that the institution of higher learning had, any opportunity presented to better the living standards of the population should be given priority.

    How does the agreement btwn GOK and WHO look like? Is there room for building same structure in a Metropolitan county like Kajiado? What do we loose by shifting the project outside the capital?
    I am assuming the leaders at the University have valid reasons for objecting that development initiative.

    Like

  2. Dear Lillian, thank you for your comments on the article I had published. I may not be aware of too much insider details on the KU Land issue. My argument was that the University needed to be proactive and pursue any details and documents and agreements that they didnt have in time. Otherwise its good to be proactive , my take though

    Like

  3. Wonderful indeed prof,let’s be optimistic that quick intervention will be realized between the parties involved

    Like

Leave a reply to Ravi Bedi Cancel reply